Welcome to PerezHilton.com
Welcome to PerezHilton.com - Hollywood's Most-Hated Web Site!
Celebrity Scoop Goes Here
E-mail Perez@PerezHilton.com

Report technical problems.
Perez Posse signup FAQ

Contact us to advertise on PerezHilton.com



Wear it, share it, give it, get it! Represent!

Jump to your favorite celebrity

Articles by date

Dakota Fanning To Join Twilight Sequel???

Filed under: Film Flickers > Dakota Fanning > Twilight > Robert Pattinson

wenn5231005.jpg

Twilight will be getting some more "star" power for part two of the film franchise!

According to reports, set to play Volturi vampire Jane, opposite hottie Robert Pattinson in the upcoming sequel, will be Dakota Fanning.

The soon-to-be 15 year-old is said to be in talks to play the Italian bloodsucker in New Moon.

A source reveals that "There were no auditions. They just offered it to her outright, and now they're in negotiations."

Really? DAKOTA FANNING???? As a vampire?

New Moon is expected to start filming in Italy this March. The flick should be released in theaters this November.

What do U think? Should Fanning take the role of vampire Jane?

[Image via WENN.]

524 comments to “Dakota Fanning To Join Twilight Sequel???”

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]



  1. 501

    fuck no.



  2. 502

    sadly, i think she fits the part great. But i hate it that they didnt make her audition just because she starred along side talented actors, which doesnt make her talented at all! She just may ruin the whole entire movie. WE WILL HAVE TO SEE.!.



  3. 503

    i think she'll be good!
    xx



  4. 504

    It's really too bad that 15-year-olds can't get naked in movies. Not legal ones, anyway.



  5. 505

    Noooooooooooo

    I don't like it when they bring in big name children's celebrities into 'Teenage-ish' films! GET RID OF HER!



  6. 506

    noooo wayy..



  7. 507

    dakota will be great as jane. it is the perfect role for her. i can't wait to see new moon. i have seen twilight 15 times in theaters and read the books non-stop. at least 20 or 30 times.



  8. 508

    That is a great addition to the cast, Dakota will make a perfect Jane!

    THANK GAHD HUDGENS IS NOWHERE NEAR THIS THING!



  9. 509

    i think shell make a great jane coz she can play a role really well and in the book it says that janes pretty and so is dakota. but it really dosent really matter wat lizard king here says as he obviously hasnt got taste wen it comes to movies or actors/actresses. :)



  10. 510

    Re: tinkgurlbellcullen – i agree with u it is so addictive..:)



  11. 511

    interesting….



  12. 512

    she doesn't really suit it,
    i imagined her with bigger eyes and lips and dark hair



  13. 513

    i REALLY dont want her to be in this movie!

    i mean the first movie was AMAZING, with people who werent really out there.

    i mean everyone who was in Twilight, has acted before but they didnt really hit it big time until Twilight, like Rob & Kristen i loved them both in the previous movies they were in prier to Twilight, and then the rest of the cast, most of them havent really played major roles and i think thats what was so fresh about the movie, you have all of these unfamiliar faces showing what they can really do w. lead roles, Dakota is soo experienced. But that isnt the only reason i think she doesnt fit the part, i just cant picture as Jane, i think the little girl from silent hill should play her, the little girl on the movie poster w. no mouth.. yeah i think shed be perfect, not Dakota… =/



  14. 514

    Dakota "overrated" Fanning? I HURL!



  15. 515

    NOOO NOO NOOOOOOOO!!!!
    She's a decent actress at all, but she is definitly NOT right to play Jane!
    >=(



  16. 516

    But oh well… it was already ruined when they cast Kristen Stuart to play Bella.

  17. SBH says – reply to this


    517

    she should totally take the part, i think she;d be qreat !!



  18. 518

    she wouldn't be a good Jane, Jane is suppossed to be fierce, hard, angry, and probably suppossed to be and act a lot older than Dakota could ever honstely play. When you think of jane, do you think of dakota? probably not. When i read the books i didn't imagine a what 13 year old girl trying to play a grown up part. I pictured someone older, wiser, and a hell of a lot tougher than dakota… honstely what the "h" were the producers thinking when they hired her to play Jane, she'll suck up the movie hard core



  19. 519

    i dont like her. she is so not angel looking
    and she wouldnt be able to pull off jane's
    power…



  20. 520

    She would be good at it
    but they should get a not as well known actor to play Jane
    shes to well knownn



  21. 521

    SIGN Petition for Jodelle Ferland to play the part of Jane.
    thepetitionsite.com/1/jodelle-ferland-for-jane-in-new-moon?page=2

    Thanks!

    If you want to see the character Jane from the book, and not be focused on a over popularized face, and you want an actress who'll blow your socks off as the wicked Jane, then vote for Jodelle Ferland at the site above. Keep the Twilight saga a work of art.



  22. 522

    she is sooo not jane.
    she is sooo wrong for this.
    she is going to ruin new moon.
    why do they keep trying to hire big
    celeberties? i like no name actors better.



  23. 523

    WTF!!!!!!!!! Thank god Jane gets killed in Breaking Dawn!!!! That was the person I wanted to be!



  24. 524

    I'm not too happy with it.. I hope Weitz doesn't go in the direction of—every popular actor or actress he knows–he'll give it to them.. come on! let's be fair.. CAST MORE UNKNOWNS!!
    but then again.. dakota could surprise us all..

More comments: « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]