Can You Spot The Differences?
Filed under: Exclusives! > Britney Spears > Photoshop Awardz
We eat our own words!
A rep for Britney Spears has told us that the pop star's new Candie's campaign is not as heavily Photoshopped as we previously speculated.
To prove the point, an exclusive image of the singer was released to PerezHilton.com (top pic).
We're told the picture is "raw" and unretouched.
Hmmm….inneresting.
If you compare the two photos (untouched above, retouched below), we're pretty sure you can spot at least a couple differences.
Can ya???
What are they???
Posted: July 7, 2009 at 7:45 pm
she looks all unnatural they should have stopped when they bumped up the color
she looks like she is in two pieces herr roots where a good call
cover up the tummy a bit, slim down the legs, and of course re-color the roots! wow.
Honestly i think she looked better pre photoshopping!
the first thing I noticed was her nose, but also mid-drift, roots, thigh…
I like both photos.
why would they photoshop to GIVE her roots? I think her ass looks bigger in the shopped pic
1) Her stomach is sticking out on un-retouched photo. It's "deleted on photoshopped photo.
2) Her whole left hip disappeared on the retouched photo. Her left hip-stomach area (where hip-bone is) was right next to her bent knee previously, on the retouched photo that whole hip area is gone and she looks so much thinner,there's NOTHING next to her bent knee anymore.
2) They made her DARK ROOTS blond
so, they retouched her roots, covered her stomach, and barely made her ass smaller…nothing that bad! there has been worse!
her like upper thighs/butt
completely no stomach
I like both, and I don't think they needed to retouch these photos actually…maybe more colours like they did, but they didn't need to retouch something else (like stomach etc.)
her butt/thigh got smaller, skin color got lighter, nose got skinnier, and they hid her belly.
Re: Li0ness – my bad….i can spell bitch cause thats what i am….good thing you can spell what u r too!!!
They photoshopped 45 lbs off her ass and got rid of her roots! HAHAHA!
Wow, she looks better in the original in my opinion
Seems they changed her jawline, brightened up her skin color, retouched the roots of her hair, stomach isn't showing, the butt cheek and leg that is showing is definitely smaller and the little wrinkle in her pants on the other leg has disappeared. THE PHOTOSHOPPING IS OUTTA CONTROL, MAN!!!!
The colors are brighter in the second one, her roots are fixed, her shirt was made longer, her legs look a bit thinner, but other than that she did actually look pretty good in the first one which I'm surprised about.
in 2nd pic:her face is droopy,her stomach is hanging out, and her butt is slightly biggger
SHES A DUMB BITCH ANYWAYS Y BE FAKE WEN U CAN BE ALL NATURAL!
besides the obvious color changes, the boots are fix, the shirt is pulled down, they shrunk her big ass, fixed her roots, get rid of one entire wrinkle in her pants.
They brightened the photo, that's why she looks more tanned. But even the other things like unshowing her stomach, I don't think that's a big deal. They just made it look more neater. That's all. Like getting rid of her roots.
Re: shannon123 – UM the top photo is untouched.
Re: breeburgher – I agree. Sucks that someone as near to perfection as Britney would be Photoshopped to death like this. Gawd, if they did me, they'd be working on it for a month!!!
They totally just hacked off her right hip! hahaha! It looks so unnatural now that i see the original photo. i love knowing that magazine photos aren't real.
exactly u asshole….britney is hot
Ass, gut, and her face is so altered she doesn't look like the same person.
Hay is brighter, skin tone, stomach covered, leg and hip reduced, eyes retouched, roots, vest brightened, overall color brightened.
Mostly minor touchup.
And of course, the black roots are gone.
WTF her body looks better in the before.
Photoshop award! 40Lbs. removed.
All I see is her roots hidden and the shirt was elongated to cover her skin that was showing. See she is naturally pretty!
Looks like they photoshopped her face the most
she looks better in the first one. she looks a little fake-ish in the second.
The list of things that I noticed that were changed:
-Her roots aren't showing anymore
-Her stomach disappeared
-They made the shirt baggier
-The overall colour/brightness of the photo changed
-The size of her thigh/butt
-The wrinkles in the boots
-The smoothness of her hair
-They added a shadow under her torso that looks like a pool of blood
-They softened the wrinkles on her pants
-Her neck arteries are less pronounced
-They changed and they erased some pieces of hay (Really obvious on the top right corner stack of hay)
And that's all I see right now.
Biggest thing I seen is the EYES and Hair and skin is a little Darker. other then that I still Love her LOL
Ohhh, I love these!
Tan skin
Root touch-ups with blonder hair altogether
Creases taken out of pants
No stomach showing
Waist is smaller
Wrinkles taken out of boots
Color in general is brighter
Ass and thigh look smaller
And her face looks totally f'd up. Doesn't even look like her in the bottom one.
Face is slimmer, eyes pop and are more open. FLAT tummy exposed.
her ass looks bigger becasue perez made the photo bigger you dumb ass's lol yeah her tum is covered and her roots are fixed.. but s&*t man she still looks hot in the raw one…. God… most of you ppl bithcin about her are porb a million times more fat and fugly ha ha
Is it just me or does it look like in the re-touched pic she look like she's been cut in half at her torso with her upper body just lying there. I like the original better.
who cares, SHES GORGEOUS!
BRITTANY FAN FOR 1O YEARS STRAIGHT
Stomach
Roots
Butt
Better Color.
Photoshopped or not, bitch still looks good. Go 'head, girl.
HER HIP AND SHIRT GOT LIKE FIXED, THEY GAVE HER SOME KIND OF EYELIFT, HER ROOTS ARE MAGICALLY DONE ,THE VEST.. THATS ALL I SEE
Britney don't need retouchs!!!!!
Yup..you can totally notice a few differences…but so what, all celeb's pics are photoshopped
i think the unedited version is miles better tbh
Yes, few differences… because the first one has been touched up heavily already.
Why the hell did they have to make her boobs look bigger and cover the infinitesimal part of her belly that was showing? Also, her hair looks much too unrealistic. In my opinion, the untouched one looks MUCH better!
Her hair, there is not shown any skin in her stomack area, her legs look skinnier, her face too.
Hair is different. Roots are now blonde. Ass is smaller. She is more tan. Belly isn't hanging out. Colors are more saturated. They even made her feet smaller!!!!
HER HAIR IS BLONDER
.
.
HER GUT IS TUCKED AWAY NOW
.
.
HER FACE AND EYES WAS DID ALSO THEY WERE CREEPY AT 1ST! LOL
.
.
LOVE U BRIT!!!!!!!! OMGGGGG IM WAITING FOR A "KILL THE LIGHTS" VID
her hair, the stomach, oh yeah and her skin is darker on the image below!!
they are two different pictures. she might look posed the same, but she isnt. her stomach isnt out in the second one coz her waist is twisted more. thats all she really moved though… both are airburshed though. duh.
I see a few things but nothing more than they do to EVERY other photo! Leave the poor girl alone!
It's called color enhancement and extending the sash at the bottom. Nothing else has really been done. You're a moron as per usual
Her fat ass and belly have disappeared! and shes still a bitch!
stomach and leggs and her roots .
Why do you have such an obsession with Photoshop? Everyone uses it and it's been around forever.
better in the raw picture, Britney is naturally stunning
They widened her cheekbones, covered her dark roots, covered her bulging tummy, thinned down her nose, downsized her arse… Ya, not THAT much photoshopping!!!! Give me a break! Even I could look good if I had photo surgery like this!
HAHA this is why she is Britney! she is GORGEOUS!!
There are more than a few differences…totally over-shopped, but who doesn't do that these days?
Her midriff is covered–butt/thighs are smaller–fixed her roots–changed her skin tone. Ugh…sad!
her roots are lightened, her thigh/butt is smaller, her stomach isn't showing, and the color is completely different. she actually looks better in the original.
i think her face looks better in the unphotoshopped version
I'm a graphic designer and photo re-touching is one of my specialies. I can spot all the re-touching and yes there is quite a lot of it. The hair, the stomach was taken in and almost disappears, the size of her hips are reduced, the overall color&contrast in the photo is Obviously drastically different to highlight her skin and the overall photo dramatically.
So her rep should eat his own words. lol. it is a good retouching job though, kudos to the RE-TOUCHER!
only changed the bottom ruffle of the shirt to cover visible stomach and cropped out some of the lower waist, general colours enhanced slight hair roots brightening … I agree that it is minimal retouching
Oh and I feel bad, for not saying that Britney shouldn't feel bad about being photoshopped, she is naturally gorgeous and I wish that honestly they would leave photos alone more. It would help the rest of us not feel so afraid to step IN front of the lense!
I was never good at this game
I honestly think the untouched one is better, She is hot! I love Britney!!!
Re: MilleniumJane –
If she was near perfection they wouldn't need to photoshop her. No one is perfect and anyone can be improved. The stars attest to this.
The top looks better
the photoshopped one makes her look deformed
butt/thighs are smaller, stomach removed, roots touched up
the untouched pic looks better…what a shame. Not sure what the point in the midriff was, not like she has a gutt hanging out.
Look at the area right above her bent knee. Previously there was a part of the hip and the bare stomach right above the bent knee, on retouched photo the whole right hip is gone and the stomach is gone and the purple blouse made longer to cover some of the stomach.
The buttocks are reduced.
Well, I am a graphic designer and I can say for sure that this is Photoshoped!
Her face was pinched and made thinner. Her skin looks
airbrushed, her arms, legs, thigh, stomach area have all been liquified (which is a tool used to make you smaller, bloated..etc) In this case, thinner/ smaller.
The colors have been contrasted with the curves or levels to really make it pop more and her face is more round than oval. Personally I like the origonal. I think just a little color fixing was all they really needed to do. Crazy
job the graphic designer did on this! Now IO am a biggg Brit fan but, this is crazy! I could have done a better job!
yep, smaller forehead, smaller thigh, stomach not shown, yellow (tan?) skin… it is photoshopped… but honestly…not that much… coz she still looks hot in the "raw" picture. ^_^
PS Kelly Clarkson's photoshopped face is much worse… that was heavily photoshopped.
Well her roots are covered up and something about her pants changed. her stomach's covered. everything basically got brighter. they added a cute little flip to her hair.
THIGH AND TORSO AND SKIN TONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
in the top one she looks stupid and the bottom one looks like a whore…..i hate pigney spears.
With out even looking too very hard I see-
1.obviously the color touch ups in general ( clothes, hay made much pinker, skin tone, just whole image had color touch ups)
2.there is stomach showing in untouched
3.wrinkle in pant leg on the leg on the ground
4.Definitely some touches made to eyes
5.there is are pieces of hay sticking up on boot on the ground in untouched
6.there is a piece of hay to the right of the picture on the top hay square 7.that is sticking out in untouched photo
8.Some kinda weird fold on her right boot on the front in the untouched
9.a fly away hair in the untouched one
10.ROOOTS are showing in the untouched pic
11.It might just be me but her butt looks retouched to be smaller along with her hip
She looked hotter before she was retouched! And I wish they didn't cover up her gorgeous stomach!!!
they didnt need to do any retouching at all. go brit brit
the roots in her hair are blonder, the coverd her stomach, her a skin a brighter glow (it loooks really good) made her lips smaller
They removed her dark roots and bad eyeliner as well as making her nose look slimmer. The shape of her face and tone of her skin look different. Britney wishes she looked as good in person as she does in that photoshopped picture.
Honestly she was so pretty in the before, she doesn't need photoshop… People here make her sound like this disgusting looking swap fat thing in the before. She's looks good in both!
I think she looks pretty fucking fabulous in both.
They changed her eyes too, the makeup for sure but it looks a little further apart in the secondone. Too bad they left her neck like that..
If you look really close u can see she is turned more in the bottom one. These r 2 different pics but she moved very lil there r still touch ups but i think there to different frames.
Her roots, thighs, stomach!!!!!, she's prettier on the original one
Her neck bones, her roots, her thighs slimmed, hair not sticking out in second pic……
yes there are the small things like the clothing over the belly and the roots in the hair…but in terms of the attractive of her face and the skinniness of her body…the only thing i can spot is that they made her eyes SMALLER, when normally people need the opposite effect done during the photoshop process…so i think it is safe to say that brit is an au naturale beauty and is healthy&fit right now
Don't eat your own words. they lie. I think the fact that her stomach is completely missing in the second picture makes that obvious
I think the top one looks better. and she has no torso in the bottom pic on top of other color changing and resizing.
apparently "pretty" ppl dont have torsos. lesson learned.
1. there was some stray hairs by her bangs that were removed.
2. Her tummy isnt showing in the 2nd
3. Her roots
4. The colors are more vibrant in the 2nd
she's whiter. Her hair is nicely dyed. He stomach magically disappeared and he jeans have less wrinkles…
the colour is brighter, her roots are gone, that hair sticking up is gone, stomach gone, smaller ass, and theres something on the boot thats gone too.
i think the "raw" one is better cause she looks fake as fuck in the other one.
She's just not that pretty anymore…that was my first clue. Brit had her beauty heyday when she was 16-18, after that it was, well downhill and she started to look just like any other 20 something.
smaller butt/thighs, hid the roots and made the hair shiny, skin looks smoother and tanner, covered her stomach, changed her face a bit, and just overall brightened it.
oh yeah, BARELY photoshopped. :/
Her neck's been smoothed out too