Can You Spot The Differences?
Filed under: Exclusives! > Britney Spears > Photoshop Awardz
We eat our own words!
A rep for Britney Spears has told us that the pop star's new Candie's campaign is not as heavily Photoshopped as we previously speculated.
To prove the point, an exclusive image of the singer was released to PerezHilton.com (top pic).
We're told the picture is "raw" and unretouched.
Hmmm….inneresting.
If you compare the two photos (untouched above, retouched below), we're pretty sure you can spot at least a couple differences.
Can ya???
What are they???
Posted: July 7, 2009 at 7:45 pm
Ass is smaller in the second one, tummy not showing, roots are gone, wrinkles in boots have been omitted. My husband is a graphic designer and I've watched him 'improve' a pic. There have probably been a TON of very subtle changes as well.
Differences: Color (obiviously), Hair, Eyes, Nose, Jawline, Stomach, Ass and Knees. The top pitcure is fine though, its not bad, theres no need to photoshop these pictures..its sad that the world demands perfection!
she looks amazing in the first one!!
Only the color has been enhanced in the 2nd picture. Again one of your fabricated stories has bit your fat ass. If you want to see Photoshoped, take a look at your Advocate cover. There's a huge difference between the fatty we see in videos and how you appear in print. Your site is nothing but lies douchebag.
ok apart frm the obvious!! WTF is up wit her face in the first one????
Roots, Slimmer thigh, stomach hidden, skin tone less ashy, slimmer waist and smaller forehead.
um her ass is smaller and her thighs are thinner in photoshopped
its been retouch daaa because its a add for candies, but i dont really see much wrong with the origional. that is what i think britneys rep is trying to show.
no difference
She looks great -ive gotta hand it to her
the fact that they sent you the pic shows they are desperate….and also stupid….the pic was CLEARLY photoshopped…A LOT!!!!!
Barely Photoshopped…yeah, right. They took off about 20lbs and changed her forehead, hair and lots of other areas.
Fat gut, black roots, and big ass in the top one.
all i can see theyve done is pretty standard, tidied up her hair (covered the roots), neatened up the makeup, covered up the bit of her stomach that was exposed. however they did make her thigh/bottom smaller, but even then not not much
Madonna roots gone, gut not hanging out, thighs and ass smaller, face not as harsh - but other than not, same photo — LOL
Re: Mario Steals Stories – Only the color???? Wow, sweetie i think you need glasses or something. Did you not notice her roots? Her stomach? Her thigh? Hell, they even changed her hairline! Just the color my ass!
she looks better in the untouched one?
she is randomly dressed in both
Re: remoir – a "heffer", OR if spelt correctly by perezezdashiz, a heifer is a cow! hope that helped
Her ass looks smaller and her thighs aswell, her nose is thinner and narrower. Stomach isnt hanging out anymore, been covered. Dark roots have been touched up with more blonde, forehead looks more taught, cheekbones look fuller, her eyes look smaller and her nose and mouth look smaller aswell. She looked ok before it was photoshopped
I much prefer her face in the top one.
she is more sexy in the untouched photo anw love u babe
it is photoshopped but the one that's not retouched is prettier still.
The retouched looks worse. They ate away her stomach, looks awkward compared to the original
The dark roots in her hair have been removed, her stomach isn't there, they've lightened her skin and made her butt and thigh look leaner and more rounder. Sheeeesh!!!
Holy Crap what did they do to her head?!?!
When compared she looks like a horse face!
I wonder how much photoshop Perez would need to make any product sell….
lol…I lthink you should start a new blog on all the celebs that smack you out…
Those who cant, critique Perez…
the whole bottoms picture is a different color from where its been edited!!!
just like everyone else said
her roots
her legs and thinner
her stomach
the shirt color
and she has a glow in the bottom one!
Yeah, it's retouched. But the untouched could easily been used for the ad. She's looks beautifull.
1. Legs/Butt smaller
2. Arms smaller
3. Stomach gone
4. Hair roots
5. Skin tanner
This is completely retouched!!!
the top one doesn't even look like her…everything is photoshopped now-a-days so what do you expect? and it really isn't that big of a difference between the two, you're overreacting…as usual
OMG! MAJOR photoshop!!!!!!!
Her roots, her make-up, her stomach, her butt…
How can they claim they didn't touch it up???
Oh wow!
I just noticed how much smaller they made her WAIST look too!
And the wrinkles in the jeans…
.
.
What DIDN'T they Photoshop?????????
well the most odvious are hair- roots, eyes, and shirt.
her roots are touched up, thighs skinnier, belly covered and i think her nose is thinner, too…
T O T A L L Y PHOTOSHOP!
I still think she looks a lot better than she was in previous years. I mean look at the unphotoshopped picture compared to her like two years ago she has worked alot and looks great
lol thats too funny, they photoshopped the hell out of that pic…lol….
LOL. how about the fact they removed an entire portion of her body, and thinned everything. Ridiculous.
(1) Touched up her roots
(2) Covered her stomach
(3) Made her tush smaller
(4) Changed skin tone
Her stomach isn't showing, she has roots, her skin looks brighter, her ass looks smaller….think someone isn't telling the truth
all i see is the hair and stomach
even the hay is more pink in the retouched one, gimmie a break, it was completely redone!
you know how many people do way more shit then this? who cares.
her butt and thighs are thinner, also her belly is hidden,skinnier waist, the top of the hair had black lights and now don´t and she had a wrinkle on the back of the right thigh (of the jeans). The un-photoshopped pic looks better!
ur such an azzhole! She looks amazing! Hair and makeup is all she needs to look fab
1- roots and a bit of hair sticking up
2- stomach
3- chin
4- leg is a bit thinned down
5- better colour
.
.
there actually not that major in my opinion (unlike gags retouching!)
You Perez are a scumbag .
they fixed her roots!!!
Neck, hair, thighs, belly and boobies
I actually like her with the belly then without. She looks way too thin in the second one.
her entire waistline, her hair, her face her legs, the colour is edited, her shirt where her ribs are, her entire face. If I could see it closer I bet her jaw, lips, eyes, nose are all touched. I do retouching and there isn't much other than her boots that weren't edited… nevermind I just looked, buckles are gone on both boots and wrinkles in the boots are touched. I'd be ok with most of it except the making her look like her hips are non existent, its really not necessary!
Her face is totally different, they fixed her shirt from showing her belly. filled in the black in her hair to look blonde, her leg and thigh look smaller in second pic.
everyone pretty much got them all,,, but I will say her face looks damn good and allthough they did thin her ass and thin the orginal version is pretty darn good. And I still really like those boots !!
oMG! Its a total different person! The bottom pic 'brittnay' is way more tan then the top pic of BRitnay! I like the top one better. MOre natural and healthy looking.
the roots are blonder, her thighs are smaller, the colour of her shirt is lighter, her face is flawless, her hands seem more delicate, the hay is pinker and the shirt is covering her stomach and her staff is also more pink and has more sparkles. that's what i saw
Okay… we have the hair, her belly, the size of her thighs, her tan, her boobs, forehead, wrinkels round nose/mouth, the button of her pants is on a difefrent spot….
Isn't that enough (read: too much) already ???
hey so what thats what photoshop is for to make it more polished for a prettier effect. i like it. although sometimes photoshop is too much, like the kelly clarkson retouch….yay for her singing tho???
1. Her thigh is thicker pre touchup
2. Dark roots
3. Tummy tuck
4. tan skin
They Are Hardly Retouched!
She Looks Good Doesnt Matter
Weather Yu Retouch Her Or Not
1. they lengthened the shirt to cover the belly
2. they colored her hair to get rid of her roots
3. they tamed the bangs flyaways
4. they made her forehead shorter
5. made her nose thinner
6. made her lips thinner
7. made the hay pinker
8. removed makeup from under her eyes
7. changed the color of her shirt
they made her eyes smaller, her face thinner and her forehead smaller too….
how can none of you had seen those changes? lol
her stomach disappears, along with her right hip
butt is smaller
face is made brighter
roots have been touched up
her eyes look funky in the retouched photo…
her roots have been touched up, her hairline brought forward, her eye lids lowered/eye makeup darkened, top lip plumped, gut is gone, and ass/thighs slimmed down. wowwwww.
They chaged a few things, nothing major. And to be honest, I like the non touched up one better.
the belly, the dark roots of the hair, the ass and the skin.
compared to other photoshopped shuff this isnt that photoshopped.. get off her ass… she looks hot..
She looks great Get over it!
the ONLY differences are the roots are blonder, her tummy is now hidden, and her tan looks more settled in the bottom one. no "major" retouching done. seen britney live, she's a hot girl!
Re: sonoitaliano –
jajajaja
Re: Sassyterp –
good
Yep! They touched up her roots and covered the belly!!
On top of everything everyone mentioned…i noticed her nose was slimmed down, as well as her eyes and lips.
her nose is slimmer, as well as her eyes and lips
hair, face, tummy, hips lmao
they should've just lightened it up and touched up her roots
@perezisaFATUGLYWHORE. I LOVE you!
It Is Hardly Photoshoped!
Just her Tummy Her Ass And Her Hair
Chaning The Contrast is Not Photoshopping It Just Make Things Bright or Darker This Is Harly Photoshopped People!
Re: j_baybe – Her face looks bigger (rounder) in the after! Odd stuff!
barely photoshoped?!?!
she looks lot different without photoshop…
lights, retouches… in those two and the others too…
:/
What PROOF is there that the RAW image is really raw? Couldn't they have submitted a retouched image and claimed that it was raw? What is there to stop them from lying about it? It is Hollywood, and the music industry–two notoriously disingenuous entities working together. Think, people!
I think Brit looks great in both pics.
She is really cute.
they did sooo much.. they even movd her fuckin hairline further down… WOOOOOWWWW and the messed up her lips.. covered her stomach .. brightened up the entire pic..
the untretouched one is soo much better