Home Videos Photos

Philip Seymour Hoffman Didn’t Leave Any Money To His Kids! Find Out Why And Which Person Got His Entire Fortune HERE!

| Filed under: Legal MattersSad SadBusiness BlitzFamilyPhilip Seymour HoffmanPerezcious Parenting

philip seymour hoffman doesnt leave kids trust fund

Usually, parents want to make sure that their kids are taken care of for the rest of their lives, but sadly that wasn’t quite the case this time.

When Philip Seymour Hoffman died, he left behind ten-year-old Cooper, seven-year-old Tallulah, and five-year-old Willa, but he left them with nothing.

New court documents were filed on July 18th in Manhattan Surrogate Court, stating that accountant David Friedman and PSH had talked about setting up a trust for his kids previously, but that he wanted all of his $35 million to go to their mom, and his longtime partner Mimi O’Donnell.

Why, you ask?

Because the actor didn’t want them to be trust fund kids! The accountant also added that Philip treated Mimi like a wife as well, even though they weren't married.

The good news is that since Mimi is the kids’ mother, the money will likely be spent on them anyway. Hopefully she sets up something for her trio though, because not all trust fund kids turn out badly, and at least they’ll be taken care of!

[Image via WENN.]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Amber Rose And Wiz Khalifa: Before Their Romance Went Up In Smoke!
The 24 Most Heartbreaking TV Deaths From Last Season
The Top Earning Actresses In TV!
Joan Rivers' Best Quotes & One-Liners
Joan Rivers' Style Through The Years: An Homage To Fashion's Most Colorful Critic
Justin Bieber's Numerous Run-Ins With The Law: From Worst to THE Worst!
Email this  »
Welcome back, !
or logout

or login or create a Perez Posse account!

6 comments to “Philip Seymour Hoffman Didn’t Leave Any Money To His Kids! Find Out Why And Which Person Got His Entire Fortune HERE!”



  1. 1

    Good for him. A good parent wants their child to be productive and self-sufficient - not give them everything so they don't have to do anything.

  2. shaygirl says – reply to this


    2

    he left it to their mother. he wants them raised not reporting to a lawyer

  3. Esin Emko says – reply to this


    3

    With all due respect, the $35 million figure is a gross exaggeration.

  4. lisa says – reply to this


    4

    this is the most screwed up freaken story there is, he left his money to his defacto who is the mother of his children, why are you making it sound scandalous?

  5. The Idiot is a DOUCHE says – reply to this


    5

    What a total fool. So that means her future boy toys will be spending his kids money while they watch it go up in smoke. When I die, all my money, my business (if it still exists then) and whatever I get from my parents business and estate (god forbid) will go HUGELY to my kids. The "wife" (if i have one then) will get a respectable share but NOTHING compared to my kids. Phil is a FOOOOOOOOOL.
    Blood is thicker than water. A wife is just water, dumbass. Money floats on blood and sinks in water. (I think. I dunno. nah. probably not). Only the most evil parents make their kids start OVER from scratch rather than continuing the family success in the form of starting businesses or whatever. This guy has no "family tree power" instinct. If he was my dad.. I would literally shiiit on his grave.



  6. 6

    What's wrong with leaving some money for your own kids? Just because your kids inherited some money doesn't mean they'll end up being bums.