Kim Kardashian’s Robbery May Not Have Happened?? That’s What This Supreme Court Justice Seems To Be Implying…

no title

Kim Kardashian West is used to being judged by the court of public opinion — but not the SUPREME one!

After her high-profile robbery early Monday morning, the KUWTK star’s case has made its way to Washington… because even the gosh darn Supreme Court is talking about it!

Related: Kim Plans To Amp Up Security & Scale Back On Social Media!

Apparently, Justice Stephen Breyer touched upon Kim’s robbery while addressing an unrelated case on Tuesday — one that involves a California man saying the bank accounts he stole don’t quite qualify as fraud since the money was insured.

Proving his pop culture prowess, the honorable judge actually referenced KimmyKakes specifically during his opening arguments discrediting the criminal, saying:

“Even Kardashian’s thief, if there is one, believes that all that jewelry is insured. So, it’s not theft?”

Wait, what does he mean “if there is one”? Does he think it’s all a hoax, Ryan Lochte style? Is Justice Breyer a Kim K truther??

LOLz! Probably not!

We feel so bad for Kim right now… but it would feel so much worse to think the Supreme Court was questioning your story!

Do U think Kim’s robbery is beyond a reasonable doubt??

[Image via Judy Eddy/Carrie Devorah/WENN.]

Oct 4, 2016 6:16pm PDT

More Like This