Kim Kardashian is speaking out in defense of Lyle and Erik Menendez.
The brothers were convicted in 1996 of murdering their parents Jose and Mary Louise “Kitty” Menendez in the late ’80s. They had claimed they killed them in self-defense following years of physical and sexual abuse, but during a second trial, a judge deemed the abuse allegations inadmissible. They were ultimately given life sentences.
The case was thrust back into the spotlight recently, thanks in large part to Ryan Murphy‘s controversial new Netflix series, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story. And surprisingly that attention is making a big difference! Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón announced earlier this week that his office is reviewing new evidence in the case! The Menendez Brothers actually have a chance of seeing daylight after all these years!
Related: Garth Brooks BLASTS Rape Accusation & Calls Lawsuit A ‘Hush Money’ Grab
The new evidence in question is a letter sent to their cousin, Andy Cano, in which Erik detailed being molested by his father. It’s still his word, but in court they look for that kind of contemporary evidence — showing someone was telling the same story right when it happened. It bolsters their case. The DA hasn’t made any decisions about whether or not they believe the new info, but they’re looking into it — and it gives the felons their first real chance at getting out from behind bars in a long time!
Now, aspiring lawyer Kimmy Kakes is speaking out on their behalf, advocating for their prison release!
Contents [hide]
You think you know the story…
On Thursday, Kim penned a heartfelt essay for NBC News, discussing how the brothers were affected first by the abuse… and now by the time inside:
“We are all products of our experiences. They shape who we were, who we are, and who we will be. Physiologically and psychologically, time changes us, and I doubt anyone would claim to be the same person they were at 18. I know I’m not!”
She then opened up about the case, acknowledging, like so many, that she didn’t understand the brothers’ full predicament at the time the brutal killings were first reported. She recalled:
“You think you know the story of Lyle and Erik Menendez. I certainly thought I did: In 1989, the brothers, aged 21 and 18, respectively, viciously shot and killed their parents in their Beverly Hills home. In 1996, after two trials, they were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. As is often the case, this story is much more complex than it appears on the surface. Both brothers said they had been sexually, physically and emotionally abused for years by their parents. According to Lyle, the abuse started when he was just 6 years old, and Erik said he was raped by his father for more than a decade. Following years of abuse and a real fear for their lives, Erik and Lyle chose what they thought at the time was their only way out — an unimaginable way to escape their living nightmare.”
It certainly sounds like Kim is sympathetic to their plight. Who wouldn’t be? But what about the law?
Addressing the trial complications, she continued:
“Their first trial was heard before two separate juries, one for each brother. Their abuse claims formed the foundation of their defense, with family members testifying on their behalf. After hearing this evidence, over half of the 24 jurors voted not guilty on the murder charges, resulting in hopelessly deadlocked juries and mistrials, widely seen as a blow to the Los Angeles District Attorney’s Office.”
But was it a reflection of the DA doing a bad job? Or the truth of the case just being too complicated for a clean guilty verdict?
Court TV
Here’s where the Menendez brothers’ lives intersected with Kim’s…
“Soon, the Menendez brothers’ case would continue to play out amid another high-profile murder case prosecuted by the same DA’s office. More than four months after the Menendez mistrials, O.J. Simpson was charged with the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman. Then, eight days after Simpson’s acquittal, opening arguments began in Erik and Lyle’s second trial.”
The O.J. Simpson case — the one her father was on the defense for. The DA lost that one, too. She’s tying them together — implying the DA did NOT want to suffer the embarrassment of losing both cases. Hmm. Discussing how this trial was different, she revealed her indictment of the system:
“However, this time, the judge had changed the rules: both brothers were tried together before a single jury, much of the abuse evidence was deemed inadmissible, and manslaughter was no longer an option. Some witnesses from the first trial were barred from testifying about the alleged abuse, depriving the jurors of crucial evidence. The prosecutor, having successfully argued to exclude the abuse testimony, mocked the brothers’ defense during his closing arguments for not producing any evidence of abuse.
Their lawyer has since said the judge’s rulings essentially acted as a ‘directed’ verdict. And so, the brothers were convicted. They were sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and have remained incarcerated for almost 35 years. Their only way out of prison now is death.”
Blaming the media for influencing the public’s perception of the murders, she noted:
“The first trial was televised for all to see, and Erik and Lyle’s case became entertainment for the nation, their suffering and stories of abuse ridiculed in skits on ‘Saturday Night Live.’ The media turned the brothers into monsters and sensationalized eye candy — two arrogant, rich kids from Beverly Hills who killed their parents out of greed. There was no room for empathy, let alone sympathy.”
It wasn’t just the media…
Different For Boys
All of society that wasn’t ready to hear the real story of the Menendez brothers and their alleged years of abuse:
“Erik and Lyle had no chance of a fair trial against this backdrop. Back then, there were limited resources for victims of sexual abuse, particularly for boys. There were virtually no systems in place to support survivors, and public awareness of the trauma of male sexual abuse was minimal, often clouded by preconceived judgments and homophobia.”
Kim specifically speculated Erik and Lyle’s gender played a big role in the case — that boys were never seen as victims of sexual abuse at the time, that no one wanted to hear it then.
She wrote:
“Can anyone honestly deny that the justice system would have treated the Menendez sisters more leniently? Despite overwhelming family testimony acknowledging the abuse Erik and Lyle suffered, the public remained skeptical. Robbed of their childhoods by their parents, then robbed of any chance of freedom by a criminal justice system eager to punish them without considering the context or understanding the ‘why,’ and without caring about whether the punishment fit the crime, Erik and Lyle were condemned before the trial even began.”
The SKIMS founder urged:
“According to Erik and Lyle, they were physically, sexually and emotionally abused by their parents since childhood, and their father repeatedly raped them when they were just little boys. Many people believe the crimes the brothers committed are unforgivable — but what about the decades of alleged abuse they suffered as children?”
It does add a totally new perspective to the case. If Gypsy Rose Blanchard is any indication, the public can be more compassionate when they believe someone involved in a killing was also the victim of abuse, as these men are claiming.
‘They are not monsters.’
But why is Kim so passionate about this case? The model actually met up with the brothers, and she only had kind things to say about ’em. She reflected:
“I have spent time with Lyle and Erik; they are not monsters. They are kind, intelligent, and honest men. In prison, they both have exemplary disciplinary records. They have earned multiple college degrees, worked as caregivers for elderly incarcerated individuals in hospice, and been mentors in college programs — committed to giving back to others. When I visited the prison three weeks ago, one of the wardens told me he would feel comfortable having them as neighbors. Twenty-four family members, including their parents’ siblings, have released statements fully supporting Lyle and Erik and have respectfully requested that the justice system free them.”
That said, she’s in no way ignoring the fact they did — and there’s no question about it — kill their parents. However, we’re now back to the opening statement about time changing you. And it’s been a LONG time. Kim explained:
“The killings are not excusable. I want to make that clear. Nor is their behavior before, during or after the crime. But we should not deny who they are today in their 50s. The trial and punishment these brothers received were more befitting a serial killer than two individuals who endured years of sexual abuse by the very people they loved and trusted. I don’t believe that spending their entire natural lives incarcerated was the right punishment for this complex case. Had this crime been committed and trialed today, I believe the outcome would have been dramatically different. I also strongly believe that they were denied a fair second trial and that the exclusion of crucial abuse evidence denied Erik and Lyle the opportunity to fully present their case, further undermining the fairness of their conviction.”
Addressing the new evidence and her hopes for this legal process moving forward, the socialite concluded:
“With their case back in the spotlight — and considering the revelation of a 1988 letter from Erik to his cousin describing the abuse — my hope is that Erik and Lyle Menendez’s life sentences are reconsidered. We owe it to those little boys who lost their childhoods, who never had a chance to be heard, helped or saved.”
Whoa!
Kinda seems like Kim might have what it takes to be a lawyer after all! This is erudite, moving, well-reasoned stuff! It’ll be interesting to see what the DA does next…
Thoughts, Perezcious readers? Do you agree with Kim? Let us know (below)!
[Image via CDCR/MEGA/WENN]